Get the weekly summary of crypto market analysis, news, and forecasts! This Week’s Summary The crypto market ends the week at a total market capitalization of $2,17 trillion. Bitcoin continues to trade at around $62,300. Ethereum experiences no changes and stagnates at around $2,400. XRP is down by 2%, Solana by 1%, and Dogecoin by 3%. Almost all altcoins are trading in the red, with very few exceptions. The DeFi sector decreased the total value of protocols (TVL) to around…
What is Insider Trading? Why Should Crypto Networks Discourage it?
When it comes to cryptocurrencies, insider trading does not go without mention. The subject has been a hot topic in the crypto space to the extent of media outlets. In addition, cryptocurrency exchanges such as Coinbase have also faced lawsuits due to allegations of insider trading.
Over the years, the government has not set measures against organizations that take part. But, the CFTC’s current enforcement practices encompass cryptocurrencies. The regulation will be the same as that applied to securities by the SEC. This article will look into what insider trading entails. It will also look into why crypto networks should discourage it.
What is Insider Trading?
There is no specific definition of insider trading; however, there are three ways to be found liable for the activity in the United States. The first is classic material, where one knows non-public information about a particular company. It would work if you were an insider and trading that information.
The second is tipper liability. When someone has confidential information about a company, they tip a person likely to trade the lead. The third is tippee liability. It entails exchanging information on a tip from someone who keeps non-public information about a company.
Although, trading on material, non-public information is not a violation of United States securities laws per se. One might overhear strangers talking about such information, which does not prevent one from trading a company’s security lawfully.
Why Crypto Networks Should Discourage Insider Trading
In crypto markets, participation in insider trading can allow you to gain numerous advantages in the market. Here is why crypto networks should discourage insider trading:
Unfair Markets
Regarding insider trading, only some people receive the information as it is private. This factor undermines confidence in the crypto market, discouraging retail investors from the rigged markets.
The insiders with confidential information about the market will have the upper hand. They can avoid losses and gain from market shifts, eliminating investors’ inherent risk in the crypto market. The cryptocurrency market is still young and requires trust from investors as it goes mainstream.
If there are doubts, the public will give up on crypto. And both companies and the broad network will need help raising funds. Eventually, there might be few outsiders hence insider trading could eliminate itself.
Full Value Loss
Insider trading prevents genuine investors from getting the total value of their investments. For instance, if confidential information spreads before insider trading, the crypto market integrates information, benefiting everyone.
For example, a crypto-related company could have a new launch, but the information was private the following week. Investors could use insider information to their benefit, purchasing the cryptocurrency before the information is released.
After the announcement, the prices will rally, allowing them to profit considerably by selling. Compared to an investor with no prior information, they would gain less.
Insider Trading is Illegal
Insider trading was made illegal through court interpretations with other laws, such as the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As a result, it is only legal if the developers in charge of the company disclose their activities to the SEC. The Securities and Exchange Commission then releases the information to the public.
Insider trading did not apply to Congress members for several years, profiting lawmakers from the 2008 financial crisis. However, the public raised concerns about the issue, so government officials added it to the law in 2012.
Transparency Alteration
Most crypto companies pride themselves on their transparency such that investors have access to all information similarly. Also, their transactions happen openly, with all the information public.
It will not sit well with investors that some are receiving the information they are profiting from, even though they have equal rights to the data. Hence, this goes against the transparency feature promised for all users.
However, insider trading does not adversely affect markets, given that many transactions occur daily in crypto markets.
Information Theft
Exploiting non-public information to benefit in crypto markets is technically theft of the information. The company with bridged data has a stronger claim to be a fraud victim, as it’s their information stolen and used for personal gain. The charge might hold for those who disclosed the information. However, it is difficult to see how the company is a victim of fraud when its shareholders participate in the trading.
What Rules Apply in Crypto Trading?
What should the regular crypto trader know to stay on top of the rules? To begin, even if you are not in the US and are trading cryptos outside of the US, the SEC or CFTC may still pursue you if they believe you are utilizing insider knowledge to sell digital assets in the US market. In addition, there have been numerous cases where the SEC has sued individuals living in other countries for insider trading in securities traded in the United States.
Despite these few seeming black-and-white circumstances, insider trading law exists in the shades of gray. When regulators believe a collection of events may indicate insider trading, they are frequently eager to initiate an expensive and intrusive inquiry; even transactions conducted in good faith may be subject to regulatory examination. Moreover, applying ever-changing norms to ambiguous factual events creates traps for the unwary.
Conclusion
Insider trading law is highly complex, adding to the complication of crypto trading products, with most untested and unresolved. However, insider trading enforcement in bitcoin product marketplaces is on the way.
Traders, mainly insiders, should be cautious and seek advice, despite the costs of good legal counsel. However, failing to seek guidance before trade and defending a lawsuit from the SEC or CFTC can have far-reaching consequences.
Meanwhile, crypto networks should discourage insider trading as it does more harm than good. Yet, it is worth noting that global participation is necessary to encourage mainstream crypto adoption.
Why Bitcoin Needs the Taproot Upgrade, And What Will It Solve?
China’s Firewall Blocks User Access to CMC and CoinGecko
Written by
More author posts
Publish your own article
Guest post article. Guaranteed publishing with just a few clicks
START PUBLISHING ADVERTISE WITH US